tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post7197715287215331030..comments2024-03-10T07:05:14.115+03:00Comments on Chesstroid: Android UCI engine update: Sugar 2016.04.15 // ERRATUMAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11557168089900659488noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-578759407972770822016-07-09T00:18:34.602+03:002016-07-09T00:18:34.602+03:00Tvé engines are absolutely identical. This is no c...Tvé engines are absolutely identical. This is no change!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18236061908654867697noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-27300180812459126022016-07-08T18:24:57.513+03:002016-07-08T18:24:57.513+03:00I'll try DiffTool but equality of MD5 checksum...I'll try DiffTool but equality of MD5 checksum should be enough to confirm two builds are the same.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557168089900659488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-51032046040151635782016-07-08T17:32:17.108+03:002016-07-08T17:32:17.108+03:00"DiffTool... + DiffDroid" can be used ea..."DiffTool... + DiffDroid" can be used easily from ES. And it seems to me that it gives more information. For clones it is possible to see not only total quantity of changes, but also to compare each byte. And respectively to understand: whether we deal with normal substitution of the name or essential changes are made to parameters of an engine. It I seemed to me very conveniently. But this my subjective judgement :)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16856175325877876225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-1802518940531555602016-07-08T14:53:28.455+03:002016-07-08T14:53:28.455+03:00I usually compare with ES File Explorer. It can sh...I usually compare with ES File Explorer. It can show MD5 checksums. Same checksum = Same checksum. I didn't do this control with Sugar in a hurry. And the ID label was concincing due to the date format.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557168089900659488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-32182520773077684772016-07-08T13:16:11.257+03:002016-07-08T13:16:11.257+03:00I decided to find a method of exact comparing of s...I decided to find a method of exact comparing of suspicious engines. With it I was helped by the program "DiffTool the File Compare Tool" + "DiffDroid" (extension for convenience). Sugar versions of 100% are identical. And here the clone of "ChessPro 1.0" differs from "Stockfish DD" on 15251 bytes or for 3,5%.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16856175325877876225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-48555263865576883382016-07-08T00:47:28.364+03:002016-07-08T00:47:28.364+03:00Yes. I will post all Stockfish 3.X 4.X 5.X 6.X and...Yes. I will post all Stockfish 3.X 4.X 5.X 6.X and 7.X builds in dedicated posts, like i did for 2.X. Soon to come.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557168089900659488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-86935776096160067982016-07-07T22:42:37.208+03:002016-07-07T22:42:37.208+03:004 old gnuchess-5 version : https://cloud.mail.ru/p...4 old gnuchess-5 version : https://cloud.mail.ru/public/3dWT/hgKbwMxfHAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16856175325877876225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-53459286061624843002016-07-07T22:21:46.214+03:002016-07-07T22:21:46.214+03:00I check versions of old Stockfish and here that no...I check versions of old Stockfish and here that noted: 1) As I understand Stockfish 6.0.OR from the official site actually of pie version 2) nopie is in pbchess, it is possible to add 3) B CEPA is other assembly of Stockfish 3.0 too it is possible to add.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16856175325877876225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-4831069237610437162016-07-07T21:54:59.188+03:002016-07-07T21:54:59.188+03:00From now, no more engines.From now, no more engines.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05929281890577279369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-33396201978393965722016-07-07T21:51:44.148+03:002016-07-07T21:51:44.148+03:00I think, this Sugar is old, same size, same type o...I think, this Sugar is old, same size, same type of playing.<br />It is sad, i was hoping that, this is new version :((Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05929281890577279369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-10382829843740050782016-07-07T19:22:32.818+03:002016-07-07T19:22:32.818+03:00Hmm, i've gotta check this about Sugar. The st...Hmm, i've gotta check this about Sugar. The standalone Stockfish clones, i know all of them. They must not be taken into account.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557168089900659488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871144077473330158.post-63307071191257670682016-07-07T18:57:40.339+03:002016-07-07T18:57:40.339+03:00I didn't find differences from the old version...I didn't find differences from the old version. Identification and the size are identical. Whom clones interest: in "google play" there is an old program "Professional Chess Free". It seems that it is DroidFish with advertizing, but behind a mask of Stockfish - "ChessPro 1.0" clone is hidden:https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4coD/j27BJrUJB I don't know: deception it or not.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16856175325877876225noreply@blogger.com